Talk:Keith's Hut: Difference between revisions
imported>Lommer m grammar |
imported>Swebster bridge is new? |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Image:Cerise Creek New Bridge.jpg|thumb|400px|right|the new bridge, ~100 feet upstream]] | [[Image:Cerise Creek New Bridge.jpg|thumb|400px|right|the new bridge, ~100 feet upstream]] | ||
I'm not sure what people are referring to regarding the bridge being out on the Cerise FSR, so I thought I'd put some pics up here for clarity. The clubtread thread linked to in the article indicates shows pictures of the old log, which is indeed unserviceable. However, there is a new bridge only slightly upstream that has been cobbled together with a log, some board, and nailed together with railway spikes. It would be easy to miss the new bridge if you didn't look around a bit at the creek, but I suppose it's possible that at high water the new bridge would be submerged. That said, unless it's truly unsatisfactory, I'm not really in favour of encouraging people to use the newly flagged route through the forest and blazing a whole new trail... -[[User:Lommer|Lommer]] 11:44, 17 July 2009 (PDT) | I'm not sure what people are referring to regarding the bridge being out on the Cerise FSR, so I thought I'd put some pics up here for clarity. The clubtread thread linked to in the article indicates shows pictures of the old log, which is indeed unserviceable. However, there is a new bridge only slightly upstream that has been cobbled together with a log, some board, and nailed together with railway spikes. It would be easy to miss the new bridge if you didn't look around a bit at the creek, but I suppose it's possible that at high water the new bridge would be submerged. That said, unless it's truly unsatisfactory, I'm not really in favour of encouraging people to use the newly flagged route through the forest and blazing a whole new trail... -[[User:Lommer|Lommer]] 11:44, 17 July 2009 (PDT) | ||
:I think that bridge you used is very new. Ideally everyone would get together, determine the best overall route, and then use only that one. Unfortunately in reality it's a free for all, with some people flagging new routes, some people building new bridges etc. I'll post on Clubtread and bivouac about the existence of this new bridge. [[User:Swebster|Scott Webster]] 14:11, 17 July 2009 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:11, 17 July 2009
bridge out
I'm not sure what people are referring to regarding the bridge being out on the Cerise FSR, so I thought I'd put some pics up here for clarity. The clubtread thread linked to in the article indicates shows pictures of the old log, which is indeed unserviceable. However, there is a new bridge only slightly upstream that has been cobbled together with a log, some board, and nailed together with railway spikes. It would be easy to miss the new bridge if you didn't look around a bit at the creek, but I suppose it's possible that at high water the new bridge would be submerged. That said, unless it's truly unsatisfactory, I'm not really in favour of encouraging people to use the newly flagged route through the forest and blazing a whole new trail... -Lommer 11:44, 17 July 2009 (PDT)
- I think that bridge you used is very new. Ideally everyone would get together, determine the best overall route, and then use only that one. Unfortunately in reality it's a free for all, with some people flagging new routes, some people building new bridges etc. I'll post on Clubtread and bivouac about the existence of this new bridge. Scott Webster 14:11, 17 July 2009 (PDT)