Archive:VOCJ53 Proofcheck: Difference between revisions
imported>Rozada |
imported>Bigbadbasstrombone |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= Sections/things which need checking (and volunteers to do it) = | = Sections/things which need checking (and volunteers to do it) = | ||
== Cover == | |||
===Errata=== | |||
* White lines above and below photo aren't in the right spot. Should possibly be wider and placed under photo to ensure there's no gap? Also there's a gap going over to the spine, for the lines only. | |||
== Check page numbers == | == Check page numbers == | ||
| Line 18: | Line 23: | ||
* Is the article in the right section (don't nitpick - just looking for mistakes, not choices you don't agree with) | * Is the article in the right section (don't nitpick - just looking for mistakes, not choices you don't agree with) | ||
===errata=== | |||
There's a few typos on the article titles, I'll point them out as since they are high visibility I think they are worth correcting. | There's a few typos on the article titles, I'll point them out as since they are high visibility I think they are worth correcting. | ||
**Losing my virginity to VOC should be to "the VOC", although it might imply group sex instead of just with mr. VOC. The title should also be fixed in the corresponding page. | **Losing my virginity to VOC should be to "the VOC", although it might imply group sex instead of just with mr. VOC. The title should also be fixed in the corresponding page. | ||
Revision as of 20:51, 24 February 2011
We need to check VOCJ53 before Kathrin submits it to the publishers. This is our last chance to make corrections - we receive a proof back from Hemlock, but that is for us to check for their errors not ours. This must be done in 1 day - Thursday - as Kathrin must make corrections Thursday night before submission on Friday.
What to check for, how to do it
In principle all the editing is done. We are not checking for grammar/spelling - we are checking for typesetting errors. Replace the "volunteer needed" with your name, do it, and then put any discrepancies down here on the wiki. Ideally each task would get done twice by two people... Write both the page number(s) and the error.
Sections/things which need checking (and volunteers to do it)
Cover
Errata
- White lines above and below photo aren't in the right spot. Should possibly be wider and placed under photo to ensure there's no gap? Also there's a gap going over to the spine, for the lines only.
Check page numbers
volunteer still needed
- all pages are in order and correctly numbered
Check table of contents
Veenstra will do it, still need one more
- Does title/author match for each article in TOC and on the article itself
- Is the page reference correct
- Is the article in the right section (don't nitpick - just looking for mistakes, not choices you don't agree with)
errata
There's a few typos on the article titles, I'll point them out as since they are high visibility I think they are worth correcting.
- Losing my virginity to VOC should be to "the VOC", although it might imply group sex instead of just with mr. VOC. The title should also be fixed in the corresponding page.
- Mt Hood should be Mt. Hood (nitpicky, but again just because it's the index)
- Searching ForcEearly turns
- Cycling the pacific coast is missing CA
- Mt Blanc should be Mt. Blanc in both articles (for consistency)
- Frenchitlan should have all words capitalized (consistency again)
- 12 Month in the VOC should be "12 Months"
-Ignacio
Check the following sections
- Does the text make sense? The text may be in the wrong order, especially across pages.
- Do photo captions make sense? The wrong caption may be put with the wrong photo.
- At least two of the photos are repeated, dinosaur and hairy Ran. It probably isn't worth changing it though. In general I didn't notice anything wrong with the captions. -Ignacio
-The two first pictures are missing captions, they only have the name of the photographer. -Ignacio
-Some photos have the title in bold letters and most don't. It's not a big deal, but it would be best to have it all the same. -Ignacio
-The crew all ready to slog, in the waddington article is missing atribution. So is the map, and the fonts and arrows in there look pretty bad. -Ignacio
-Figures 1 and 2 in Caitlin's article (pg 167) are missing attribution. Picture 3 as well. -Ignacio
-Photo page 190 is missing attribution. -Ignacio
-The Larch Lurch photos have no text or attribution (probably didn't come with any) Anyone we could ask about it? -Ignacio
-Picture in Imagination (247) have no text or attribution (but it looks good though, maybe at the end of the article we could put that info) -Ignacio
- Are photos/illustrations matched with the correct article? (except colour photos, which are all printed in the same place to save money)
Hiking and Scrambling
volunteer needed
Climbing & Mountaineering
volunteer needed
Skiing and Winter Mountaineering
volunteer needed
Land & Water
volunteer needed
Travels Abroad
volunteer needed
Club Life & Reflections
volunteer needed