Archive talk:Trip Agenda 2005: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Rusmike No edit summary |
imported>Champagne No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do you think "Agenda" is an appropriate title for this page? I thought this word meant something to be done in future but the content of this page clearly refers to the past.... Maybe something like "History" would fit better. Same for [[Trip Agenda 2006]], of course. [[User:Rusmike|Rusmike]] 21:47, 11 March 2007 (PST) | Do you think "Agenda" is an appropriate title for this page? I thought this word meant something to be done in future but the content of this page clearly refers to the past.... Maybe something like "History" would fit better. Same for [[Trip Agenda 2006]], of course. [[User:Rusmike|Rusmike]] 21:47, 11 March 2007 (PST) | ||
: I don't know. "Trip History" doesn't sounds good in my p.o.v. I prefer leaving it the way it is, unless more people say the opposite. [[User:Champagne|Champagne]] 22:15, 11 March 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 06:15, 12 March 2007
Do you think "Agenda" is an appropriate title for this page? I thought this word meant something to be done in future but the content of this page clearly refers to the past.... Maybe something like "History" would fit better. Same for Trip Agenda 2006, of course. Rusmike 21:47, 11 March 2007 (PST)
- I don't know. "Trip History" doesn't sounds good in my p.o.v. I prefer leaving it the way it is, unless more people say the opposite. Champagne 22:15, 11 March 2007 (PST)